Re: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up date" [1 Attachment]

Archived posts from the ANZ Honda 600 Owners Yahoo Group
John Ph. Graf
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:46 am

Re: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up date"

Post by John Ph. Graf »

Thanks for setting things straight. Miss-read something that wasn't right in the first place and then get a guy like me using a forum like this to propagate the error. I appreciate getting the correct from all of you.
John
On Aug 11, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Ben Pender wrote:
> Get a grip, man!� Reality isn't that far out of grasp...
friend
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:54 pm

Re: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up date"

Post by friend »

Down Ben;
    Your critical attack and lack of analytical creativeness is disturbing.  This is a car guys group not a round up of political hype.  Take it to clunkers for cash dot com or what ever.
 Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of
> Ben
> Pender
> Sent:
> Tuesday, August 11, 2009 8:44 AM
> To:
> anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com
> Subject:
> Re: [anzhonda600owners]
> RE: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up date"
> John,
> That's complete BS, and I'm amazed at the
> number of folks who a) believe this sort of thing [obviously those who > lack the capacity for critical and analytic thought], and b) actually > pass it around.
> Thing is, if Obama *really* wanted to get rid of
> old cars, the Clunkers deal would have applied to cars *older* than 25 > years, not 25 years old and younger!
> Get a grip, man!
> Reality isn't that far out of grasp...
> Regards,
> Ben
> Pender
> Klassic Autos
> Vintage European Auto service, repair, and
> parts
> Madison, AL
> XXX-XXX-XXXX
> --- On
> Mon,
> 8/10/09, John Ph. Graf
>
> wrote:
> > From:
> > John Ph. Graf
> > Subject: Re:
> > [anzhonda600owners] RE: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up date" > > To:
> > anzhonda600owners@ yahoogroups. com
> > Date: Monday, August
> > 10, 2009, 8:25 PM
> > Don't know how that date got set, but something I read before the > > program was made widely public led me to believe that Obama wanted ALL > > old cars AND the spare/repair parts junked, making it impossible, if > > not illegal, to own or operate anything but a new vehicle. Under the > > guise of green, he wanted to infuse the car industry with non-tax, but > > mandated, additional income. Perhaps that's what he really meant by > > "green."
> > On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Steven Michelsen wrote:
> > > Fortunately for us, I believe the
> > > cash for clunkers program only takes cars as far back as the mid > > > 1980s.  I wonder if the "collector car lobby" (if you can call > > > it that) was responsible for that little provision?
> > > Steve
Kevin Gailey
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 12:17 pm

valves and points

Post by Kevin Gailey »

Can anyone give me a definitive clearance for points and valves.  The owners manual is to vague.
Thanks!
Kevin Gailey
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 12:17 pm

tires on ebay

Post by Kevin Gailey »

Has anyone used these tires on ebay?  Camac NC80 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/145-R-10 ... 06.c0.m245 From:
Kevin Gailey To:
anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:40:10 PM Subject:
[anzhonda600owners] valves and points
Can anyone give me a definitive clearance for points and valves.  The owners manual is to vague.
Thanks!
TOM THIES
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:47 am

Re: valves and points

Post by TOM THIES »

Kevin
I may be wrong but being they give  a range, the closer you get to the middle point would be perfect.  That is what I shoot for.
But I have a hell of a time setting my valves for some reason.  I have some one else do it.
Tom T
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
> Kevin
> Gailey
> To:
> anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com
> Sent:
> Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:40
> PM
> Subject:
> [anzhonda600owners] valves and
> points
> Can anyone give me a definitive clearance for points and valves.
> The owners manual is to vague.
> Thanks!
> From:
> "
> billmyong@earthlin k.net
> " billmyong@earthlink .net
> To:
> anzhonda600owners@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent:
> Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:31:00
> PM
> Subject:
> RE:
> [anzhonda600owners] RE: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up
> date"
> Down
> Ben;
>     Your critical attack and lack of analytical
> creativeness is disturbing.  This is a car guys group not a round up of > political hype.  Take it to clunkers for cash dot com or what ever.
>  Bill
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > anzhonda600owners@
> > yahoogroups. com [mailto:anzhonda600 owners@yahoogrou > > ps.com > > ] > > On > > Behalf Of > > Ben Pender > > Sent:
> > Tuesday, August 11, 2009 8:44
> > AM
> > To:
> > anzhonda600owners@ yahoogroups. com
> > Subject:
> > Re:
> > [anzhonda600owners] RE: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up > > date"
> > John,
> > That's complete BS, and I'm amazed at the
> > number of folks who a) believe this sort of thing [obviously those who > > lack the capacity for critical and analytic thought], and b) actually > > pass it around.
> > Thing is, if Obama *really* wanted to get rid
> > of old cars, the Clunkers deal would have applied to cars *older* than > > 25 years, not 25 years old and younger!
> > Get a grip, man!
> > Reality isn't that far out of grasp...
> > Regards,
> > Ben
> > Pender
> > Klassic
> > Autos
> > Vintage European Auto service, repair, and parts
> > Madison,
> > AL
> > XXX-XXX-XXXX
> > --- On
> > Mon, 8/10/09, John Ph.
> > Graf
> >
> > wrote:
> > > From:
> > > John Ph. Graf
> > > Subject: Re:
> > > [anzhonda600owners] RE: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up date" > > > To:
> > > anzhonda600owners@ yahoogroups. com
> > > Date: Monday, August 10,
> > > 2009, 8:25 PM
> > > Don't know how that date got set, but something I read before the > > > program was made widely public led me to believe that Obama wanted > > > ALL old cars AND the spare/repair parts junked, making it > > > impossible, if not illegal, to own or operate anything but a new > > > vehicle. Under the guise of green, he wanted to infuse the car > > > industry with non-tax, but mandated, additional income. Perhaps > > > that's what he really meant by "green."
> > > On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Steven Michelsen wrote:
> > > > Fortunately for us, I believe
> > > > the cash for clunkers program only takes cars as far back as the > > > > mid 1980s.  I wonder if the "collector car lobby" (if you can > > > > call it that) was responsible for that little > > > > provision?
> > > > Steve
zinc2u
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:45 am

Re: valves and points

Post by zinc2u »

The clearance on the ignition points is 0.012 to 0.016 inches.  I set it in this range and then use a dwell meter to tweak it to 90 degrees of dwell while the engine is running.
The exhaust and intake valve clearance is in the range of 0.0032 to 0.0047 inches.  I use a feeler gauge which is 0.004 inches.  Follow the illustration in the Z600 coupe shop manual which shows the valve position on the cam when setting the valve clearance.  After you torque the bolt, recheck the clearance setting to insure the clearance has not become less.
good luck,
Dale
> Can anyone give me a definitive clearance for points and valves.
> The owners manual is to vague.
> Thanks!
zinc2u
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:45 am

Re: valves and points

Post by zinc2u »

BTW....set the valve clearance when the engine is cold  (i.e. the engine is at ambient temperature).
> The clearance on the ignition points is 0.012 to 0.016
> inches.  I set it in this range and then use a dwell meter to tweak > it to 90 degrees of dwell while the engine is running.
> The exhaust and intake valve clearance is in the range of 0.0032 to > 0.0047 inches.  I use a feeler gauge which is 0.004 inches.  Follow > the illustration in the Z600 coupe shop manual which shows the valve position > on the cam when setting the valve clearance.  After you torque the > bolt, recheck the clearance setting to insure the clearance has not become > less.
> good luck,
> Dale
> > Can anyone give me a definitive clearance for points and valves.
> > The owners manual is to vague.
> > Thanks!
Kevin Gailey
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 12:17 pm

Re: valves and points

Post by Kevin Gailey »

Thanks Tom and Dale!
From:
"goinhm@..." To:
anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:21:11 AM Subject:
Re: [anzhonda600owners] valves and points
BTW....set the valve clearance when the engine is cold  (i.e. the engine is at ambient temperature) .
> The clearance on the ignition points is 0.012 to 0.016
> inches.  I set it in this range and then use a dwell meter to tweak > it to 90 degrees of dwell while the engine is running.
> The exhaust and intake valve clearance is in the range of 0.0032 to > 0.0047 inches.  I use a feeler gauge which is 0.004 inches.  Follow > the illustration in the Z600 coupe shop manual which shows the valve position > on the cam when setting the valve clearance.  After you torque the > bolt, recheck the clearance setting to insure the clearance has not become > less.
> good luck,
> Dale
> > Can anyone give me a definitive clearance for points and valves.
> > The owners manual is to vague.
> > Thanks!
friend
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:54 pm

Re: valves and points

Post by friend »

Go to the Honda 600 shop manual coupe supplement page 34 Paragraph A for the points and page 41 of the same manual.
Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of
> Kevin
> Gailey
> Sent:
> Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:40 PM
> To:
> anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com
> Subject:
> [anzhonda600owners]
> valves and points
> Can anyone give me a definitive clearance for points and valves.
> The owners manual is to vague.
> Thanks!
> From:
> "billmyong@earthlin k.net"
>
> To:
> anzhonda600owners@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent:
> Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:31:00
> PM
> Subject:
> RE:
> [anzhonda600owners] RE: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up
> date"
> Down
> Ben;
>     Your critical attack and lack of analytical
> creativeness is disturbing.  This is a car guys group not a round up of > political hype.  Take it to clunkers for cash dot com or what ever.
>  Bill
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > anzhonda600owners@
> > yahoogroups. com [mailto:anzhonda600 owners@yahoogrou > > ps.com > > ] > > On Behalf Of > > Ben > > Pender > > Sent:
> > Tuesday, August 11, 2009 8:44 AM
> > To:
> > anzhonda600owners@ yahoogroups. com
> > Subject:
> > Re:
> > [anzhonda600owners] RE: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up > > date"
> > John,
> > That's complete BS, and I'm amazed at the
> > number of folks who a) believe this sort of thing [obviously those who > > lack the capacity for critical and analytic thought], and b) actually > > pass it around.
> > Thing is, if Obama *really* wanted to get rid
> > of old cars, the Clunkers deal would have applied to cars *older* than > > 25 years, not 25 years old and younger!
> > Get a grip, man!
> > Reality isn't that far out of grasp...
> > Regards,
> > Ben
> > Pender
> > Klassic
> > Autos
> > Vintage European Auto service, repair, and parts
> > Madison,
> > AL
> > XXX-XXX-XXXX
> > --- On
> > Mon, 8/10/09, John Ph.
> > Graf
> >
> > wrote:
> > > From:
> > > John Ph. Graf
> > > Subject: Re:
> > > [anzhonda600owners] RE: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up date" > > > To:
> > > anzhonda600owners@ yahoogroups. com
> > > Date: Monday, August 10,
> > > 2009, 8:25 PM
> > > Don't know how that date got set, but something I read before the > > > program was made widely public led me to believe that Obama wanted > > > ALL old cars AND the spare/repair parts junked, making it > > > impossible, if not illegal, to own or operate anything but a new > > > vehicle. Under the guise of green, he wanted to infuse the car > > > industry with non-tax, but mandated, additional income. Perhaps > > > that's what he really meant by "green."
> > > On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Steven Michelsen wrote:
> > > > Fortunately for us, I believe
> > > > the cash for clunkers program only takes cars as far back as the > > > > mid 1980s.  I wonder if the "collector car lobby" (if you can > > > > call it that) was responsible for that little > > > > provision?
> > > > Steve
friend
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:54 pm

Re: [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up date"

Post by friend »

Gary, Gary;
I don't know what you are reading, all the vehicles are being crushed, and, sold to- guess where, China.  No guess on that one.  Sure there may be a vehicle here or there that will have a part removed.  But, why, they are giving more for our cement and steel than any other country.  And, we are 50% of the problem.  The Capitalists we are will sell to make a profit.  But then that is why we drive small Honda Cars that are over 35 years young.
Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of
> Gary
> Evans
> Sent:
> Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:25 AM
> To:
> anzhonda600owners@yahoogroups.com
> Subject:
> [anzhonda600owners]
> [2cylinderhondas] Re: "shock up date"
> > Cash for Klunkers cars redeemed are all destined to be crushed > - > > not a single part salvaged and used for restorations and repair of > other > > operable vehicles.
> Actually all of the 'clunkers'
> program cars end up in the usual junkyards - contrary to popular conception > they are not crushed immediately. The only requirement placed on the dealer is > to drain the oil and operate the engine with a mixture of water and powdered > glass until it will no longer idle.
> It's still a wasteful program, but
> at least the cars will have a chance to be scavenged for useful parts. Even > the engines, though damaged, are likely > rebuildable.
> -Gary
Post Reply