I agree, as I have flipped them, bounced off guard rails and purchased a Honda 600 which was wedged between two vehicles and all were repaired to drive again. The rollover, drove away from the scene of the accident after a couple of drivers pulled over and helped to put it back on it's four wheels again. The guard rail was a 45 mph bump and just bounced, I pulled the fender away from the tire and drove it home. Spent some time on that weekend and had it back on the road Monday. The wedge was a bit more extensive but the local rack pulled it straight and it too is still on the road.
Oh yea, I had no injures.
Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> 2cylinderhondas@yahoogroups.com [mailto:2cylinderhondas@yahoogroups.com] > On > Behalf Of > goinhm@...
> Sent:
> Sunday, December 27, 2009 10:45
> PM
> To:
> 2cylinderhondas@yahoogroups.com
> Subject:
> Re:
> [2cylinderhondas] when would be a good time to buy an
> az600
> The car is about 120 inches long and weighs around 1200 pounds without > the driver and passengers. If you are driving into a wall at 60 > mph, it may not be survivable (how many cars would be?). But it is > safer than I thought. I was at a gas station once and someone approached > me to ask if the Honda 600 belonged to me. He proceeded to tell me how > he read about the design of my car in an engineering journal and it was one of > the best engineered cars of its time. The front of the car is designed > to crumple on impact and the engine and its subframe is designed to break away > and go down rather than into the passenger compartment. I just listened > to him and thought "ha, ha, I wish". A couple years later I was > driving a coupe and entering an intersection at about 45 mph when a pickup > truck pulled straight in front of me. I had no choice but to hit > the truck. I was expecting the engine to come through the firewall and > it would be all over for me. Instead, there was lots of noise and > crumpling sounds and then the car came to a stop wedged under the truck.
> I was fortunate that I struck the truck right behind the rear axle (and > not at the rear axle because that would have been like hitting a wall).
> The whole front of the car was crumpled and the tires looked like they were > flat. When some people pulled the car out from under the truck, it > popped back up and the tires looked good again. What absorbed the energy > in that frontal collision was the crumpling of the body, the compressing > of the front suspension (the big coils and struts), and the compressing of the > tires. I walked away looking unharmed even though I was a little sore > for a few weeks from the sudden de-acceleration.
> I came away with more respect for the car's design. In a front or > rear collision, I think I have a good chance of surviving if the vehicle > is not jacked up high in the air. Probably not a collision > that hits me at the driver's side door. The smallness and > nimbleness of the car makes it very maneuverable and able to avoid potential > problems. While I think the car is not as safe as a car made > today, I do think it rates well for a car from the 1970s.
> that is what I know,
> Dale
> > thanks
> > i think the car may bee too small and unsafe for him to drive though, > > how small are they